Ghostbusters, the original 1984 film, has been called the definitive comedy flick of all time in many occasions. The long cult following the film has to date has even endangered the forthcoming Ghostbusters III film. Many people have stated that "Ghostbusters II" is an inferior sequel to
the original 1984 film but, I can assure you the sequel is an
entertaining film in its own right. While the original filmed had light-hearted portrayal of the evil ghosts, the sequel focuses in the negativity and hatred of New Yorkers as the core reason for the uprising of a demoniac entity known as Vigo The Carpathian.
Ghostbusters II premiered 5 years after the original film and in order to follow a single universe timeline, most of the changes seen in character development were intentionally made so that they could fit The Real Ghostbusters cartoon series, which was massively popular among kids in the 80's. For instance, the Slimer cameo scene was only filmed to allow younger audiences to understand that just like in the cartoon, Slimer lived in the Ghostbusters headquarter. Also, the jokes were toned down to appeal kids who watched the show. As above mentioned many people have classified the sequel as a rather inferior film compared to the original but then again, every change made in the sequel followed the idea of establishing a single universe timeline:
- Ghostbusters (1984)
- The Real Ghostbusters (1986-1988, although the series ran for 7 seasons until 1991)
- Ghostbusters II (1989)
- Ghostbusters III (2016, although we currently know that this isn't going to be a sequel but a reboot)
Are you talking to me? |
Never cross the streams! |
True, comedian and star Bill Murray still steals the show whenever he
gets the chance and he also gets some of the best lines, and he's just
so gosh-darn funny as a leading man. Screenwriter team/co-stars Dan
Aykroyd and Harold Ramis are also in top form, and it shows in their
wily and hilarious script. Unlike the first picture, though, it seems
like they took the family-friendly route and didn't feel like building
up to the oh-so-apocalyptic tone of the first film (even though
"Ghostbusters" was still pretty funny aside from the occasional dark
tone).
And also, director Ivan Reitman knows their material and it looks like the filmmakers made the wise decision of bringing back everybody from the original film, including Sigourney Weaver and Rick Moranis. It's been five years since the first film (a title card confirms it), and it seems that most of New York City doesn't even remember who the Ghostbusters are and what they did for the city. Everyone in the city is miserable and the opening moments confirm that as well. After being almost bankrupted by countless lawsuits and being unable to practice their trade because of a judicial restraining order, the boys are reduced to moonlighting in other fields, such as catering to the needs of spoiled yuppie children at their birthday parties, a task that neither Ray Stanz (Aykroyd) or Winston Zeddemore (Ernie Hudson) take pride in.
And also, director Ivan Reitman knows their material and it looks like the filmmakers made the wise decision of bringing back everybody from the original film, including Sigourney Weaver and Rick Moranis. It's been five years since the first film (a title card confirms it), and it seems that most of New York City doesn't even remember who the Ghostbusters are and what they did for the city. Everyone in the city is miserable and the opening moments confirm that as well. After being almost bankrupted by countless lawsuits and being unable to practice their trade because of a judicial restraining order, the boys are reduced to moonlighting in other fields, such as catering to the needs of spoiled yuppie children at their birthday parties, a task that neither Ray Stanz (Aykroyd) or Winston Zeddemore (Ernie Hudson) take pride in.
Vigo wants some love. |
Art is evil. |
Egon Spengler (Ramis) is the only one of the original Ghostbusters who
seems to have actually moved on with his life. Peter Venkman (Murray)
hosts a television show called "The World of the Psychic," a show that
apparently draws in modest ratings but no respected psychic will appear
on his show because they think he's a fraud. Anyway, things get
underway when the boys discover that nasty pink slime of supernatural
origin is discovered building up underneath the city, something that
old friend and Venkman's old flame Dana Barrett (Weaver) realizes first
hand when the slime attacks her infant son, and it's an investigation
they have to do on the down-low because of their current legal
situation.
This slime, they learn, feeds off the misery and stress of a downtrodden New York City, and it's only getting stronger as the holidays are approaching. But because no one believes in ghosts anymore, their task is even more difficult. Well, after ghost-busting the two ghouls that crash in on their trial hearing, we have no choice but to be ready to believe them. They're back in business, all right - with cynical Janine Melnitz (Annie Potts) answering the phones and Louis Tully (Moranis) on the books - tracing the source of their ghost-busting investigations to a 17th-century Moldavian tyrant named Vigo the Carpathian who wants in on the 20th century, and has possessed museum curator Janosz Poha (a hilarious Peter MacNicol) to go out and kidnap Dana's son so he can have a body so he can live again.
This slime, they learn, feeds off the misery and stress of a downtrodden New York City, and it's only getting stronger as the holidays are approaching. But because no one believes in ghosts anymore, their task is even more difficult. Well, after ghost-busting the two ghouls that crash in on their trial hearing, we have no choice but to be ready to believe them. They're back in business, all right - with cynical Janine Melnitz (Annie Potts) answering the phones and Louis Tully (Moranis) on the books - tracing the source of their ghost-busting investigations to a 17th-century Moldavian tyrant named Vigo the Carpathian who wants in on the 20th century, and has possessed museum curator Janosz Poha (a hilarious Peter MacNicol) to go out and kidnap Dana's son so he can have a body so he can live again.
There's something rotten underneath NY. |
An iconic fight. |
One thing "Ghostbusters II" provides for the viewer is solid
entertainment, which is what any good sequel should do. It would be
impossible for this movie to any way live up to the original, so you
can't blame the filmmakers for at least trying (trying is italicized).
It would be pointless to say that the acting is good from our players,
but my God, they're good and again in top form. The special effects are
still pretty impressive, even from their early ghost-busting capers, to
a finale where the boys are actually able to walk down the streets of
the city in an animated - yes, animated! - Statue of Liberty (yes, Lady
Liberty has sprung to life, and good thing she's on our side!). And
even the R.M.S. Titanic (don't ask, just watch) pops up too.
"Ghostbusters II" hasn't been particularly well-received, even despite its more family-friendly tone and message about the folly of mean-spiritedness. But it's just a good sequel, nonetheless, not bad, not superior to the original, maybe on par with the original, but it's just really good fun.
"Ghostbusters II" hasn't been particularly well-received, even despite its more family-friendly tone and message about the folly of mean-spiritedness. But it's just a good sequel, nonetheless, not bad, not superior to the original, maybe on par with the original, but it's just really good fun.
Always had a thing for Red heads. |
Mission accomplished! |
This second Ghostbusters was just fine, very entertaining and it was
nice to see all the main characters back. It had a little nicer feel to
it and was more family-friendly language-wise, so it even had some
things going for it the first one didn't have.
The other major different in this sequel was watching Peter MacNichol, who reprized his "Renfield"-type character from Mel Brooks' "Dead: And Loving It" comedy with Leslie Nielsen. Here, MacNichol plays "Janosz Poha," another wacko with a thick Eastern European accent. He is hilarious, and elevates the enjoyment of this film. Otherwise, the rest of the cast plays and acts just as they did in the first film, which means you'll get a lot of laughs out of them The story just isn't as intense, that's all. No, it can't equal the original, but.....
The other major different in this sequel was watching Peter MacNichol, who reprized his "Renfield"-type character from Mel Brooks' "Dead: And Loving It" comedy with Leslie Nielsen. Here, MacNichol plays "Janosz Poha," another wacko with a thick Eastern European accent. He is hilarious, and elevates the enjoyment of this film. Otherwise, the rest of the cast plays and acts just as they did in the first film, which means you'll get a lot of laughs out of them The story just isn't as intense, that's all. No, it can't equal the original, but.....
What happened with my master's painting? |
and they lived happily ever after. |
The bottom line is this: Don't try to compare the two films. If you
enjoyed the first, you'll like this.....period.
Here's the movie trailer:
Here's the official video for "On Our Own" (the official Ghostbusters 2 song)