Avengers: Infinity War

10 years for the carnage to be unleashed.

A couple of posts ago (three actually) I said how tired I was of seeing great ideas being tossed into the garbage bin like a cheap forgotten McDonald's burger. Obviously, I was referring to the overnight success of Comic Book films these days. In addition, I was disappointed with what Rian "Dick" Johnson had done with The Last Jedi, and yet here you have me writing about another superhero film...

Avengers: Infinity War as a standalone film, would obviously fail in so many levels, that I'd put right next to the many other films I think are just fucking cash grabs. However, seeing this film marks the 10th anniversary of what humbly started in 2008 with Iron Man, and went on for another 9 years that will surely go on for another decade. 

Avengers forever!

I don't think so.

Plot wise we get a very simple story: Thanos, the powerful space overlord has built an "Infinity Gauntlet" (the actual name of the classic comic book, you posers) that allows him to wage the powerful weight of the six infinity stones. Predictably, friends and foes from all corners of the universe have decided it is time to do something before it's too late for the whole universal existence. 

The movie benefits a lot from its prequels, where most of the characters' personalities were introduced and developed vastly enough to make us care for each of them. Nevertheless, the film does take its time to tell us who Thanos really is, and what he is actually looking for once he gets all the six precious stones. For a CGI guy, I can say he's OK but not the best villain seen in years as many are calling him all over the internet. The fact that he wants to destroy everything because he's a bad guy, seems dated, childish and plane stupid. 

Infinity War does require you to have seen some or most of the MCU in order to fully enjoy its moments, which are many. I'd say you'd have to watch the Captain America trilogy, Thor 2 & 3, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.1, the first Avengers film and Doctor Strange and then, you'll be all set for an entertaining ride. 

Girl power!

Unusual team of heroes.

Directed by the Russo brothers, who also directed Captain America: The Winter Soldier & Captain America: Civil War, the film is a celebration of ten years of entertainment and overall fun. While the film does struggle with some tonal shifts during the first act, its brilliant action scenes and clever dialogue more than make up for these shortcomings. The film's ending will be overwhelming to some and most likely will divide fans over how it is executed. The directors do a superb job developing Thanos' personality outside of simply wanting universal domination. His motivations feel somewhat morally ambiguous and at times even make him seem sympathetic. Despite the film's darker tone, there are still some hilarious scenes of banter among the heroes, particularly between Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr) and Steven Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch). 

I was so ready to tear this down - 19th MCU film, too many stars, bloated CGI, first of a two parter, and so on and so on...

Yet, this is so much fun. Pure popcorn...now in the dictionary under "popcorn film" is just the poster for this film. Somehow, the Russo Brothers have juggled all the parts to give everyone some time in the sun. They are helped immensely by two things: the premise is so pure Mcguffin that you just watch Thanos look for Infinity Stones which gives a primal momentum and that the film's stars/characters are looking to move on - that means, actual stakes for once as people could really die and not just comic book dying either.

Never upset an X-Men!

So, it's that bad again Cap,. right?

The DC people must be kicking themselves. The lightness and comedic touches are brilliant. You are laughing out loud, comedy level, but at totally organic character humor. It means you are so entertained throughout its rather long running time.

The other big surprise is Thanos himself. Normally, I hate CGI characters but somehow they have made Thanos and Josh Brolin work enough to give the character an actual arc. This is one of the better MCU villains and I never thought I would write that. In addition, and considering the massive amount of characters this film has, I was surprised to see the Russo brothers were careful enough to give key characters, enough on screen time, to show them doing their thing. Moreover, some characters were even upgraded to the legendary status they have in their respective comic books. For example, and this is not a spoiler, so rest easy, Doctor Strange shows us why he is the real master of mystic arts, and not someone to mess off with. Also, the Mighty Thor (yeah, one of my favorite superheroes of all time) recovers is God-like status, so he's not fucking around when you see him take the lead. I guess, this comes directly as a result of the wonderful Thor Ragnarok movie. In addition, Captain America and his bad-ass team have one of the coolest introduction scenes in the film. 

Not on our watch!

Space Ego V/S Tech Ego.

On the other hand, the female characters feel like they're on a "side quest" rather than part of the big fight. A disappointment considering how many fans these characters have. There's not a single scene (save for one but, nope, not spoiling it here) where they feel truly relevant. Also, I couldn't believe the scene where Black Widow returns to the screen is actually by walking towards a background showing her perfect rounded ass (I mean, isn't that sexist for today's standards?). Same thing happens with Scarlet Witch's breasts here and there.  In addition, the excessive amount of "fan service" feels a bit too much at times. Another minor issue I had, was the fact that some characters personalities were changed in order to fit into the bigger picture when there was no need in doing so. Moreover, the exhausting use of CGI goes entirely against the "painful and dramatic" motif the film has been drawing us into from start to finish. Do computers cry?.

Also, the climax feels a bit too much on the side of the old exploitation tricks 70's films relied on to keep their fans entertained. If you're a comic book reader, you know that nothing is sacred, and that nothing is impossible so, the cliffhanger was a big meh, because you know what will inevitably happen in the sequel. Cheap trick Marvel!, cheap trick.

I could use a hand.

The new Guardians of the Galaxy?

And last but not least, a couple of big downers the film had:
 

How powerful are Thanos abilites? because in one scene he fucking beats the crap out of one of the most powerful MCU characters and later he's punching and kicking far weaker characters that don't seem to be that hurt and disabled after the fight.

And one example of stupidity: When the antagonist is almost beaten, the most stupid thing takes place in order to serve an onion thick plot, and well, now I fucking hate that character.

If I was to rate the film I'd say an 8/10 if watched as it should be: a part of a bigger film collection, and a 5/10 as a standalone film due to the lack of a great many things and a gigantic CGI overuse and video-game like sequences. If I had to rate purely for fun, I'd say the film is a bold 10/10 and probably the film of 2018.  

The film in a single sentence? "Genocide is a good thing".

Here's the movie trailer collection:

Trailer #2:

Trailer #1:

And the red carpet show:

Spider-Man Homecoming

Lame.

Superhero films are getting more and more retarded with time, and when some decide to make serious driven films, fanboys bash them like there's no tomorrow. I still think Batman V Superman was an excellent film, an got even better with the extended edition. In addition, Suicide Squad took all the tricks Marvel's been praised for and again, shot to pieces.

 

Marvel's first Spider-Man movie is exclusively for kids & teens despite it has a few moments for adults, though it can sour upon further reflection.

Let's start with the good stuff. Tom Holland is probably the best Spider-Man yet. His best friend provides great comic relief and the two have terrific chemistry. Marisa Tomei adds a breathe of fresh air to the role of Aunt May. Michael Keaton provides Marvel with its first memorable villain in a while (and perhaps the only characters we grown ups can relate to, and Aunt May of course). The action scenes flow smoothly, and the humor mostly works (again, this is a teen movie).

Those are the things that stand out after immediately leaving the theater, and for that reason it gets "meets the standards" marks in my book. 

 

Superhero by night.

Boring breakfast club parody by day.

But the adult in me started thinking about what I just watched, and there's some stuff that bugs me. The following contains minor spoilers.

"With great power comes great responsibility" is the famous line from the first Spider-Man, which neatly summarizes the core theme of the film, and Peter Parker's internal conflict with being Spider-Man.

This film also has a one-liner like that, spoken to Peter by Tony Stark: "If you're nothing without this suit, you don't deserve to wear it." Which sounds like a god awful nod the shitty Iron Man 3 film that ended the solo career of the metal-asshole man. And it's actually quite illustrative of what's wrong with this film.

The fist Spider-Man movie in 2002 emphasized taking responsibility for your actions. The amount of responsibility this Spider-Man takes for his actions is, well, none. A list of the damage this "friendly neighborhood" Spider-Man directly/indirectly inflicts includes: - Swinging through a neighborhood destroying roofs, fences, tree houses, etc. - Blowing up a bodega - Setting a bomb off in the Washington Monument nearly killing all his friends - Blowing up a boat, nearly drowning everyone on board - Nearly crashing a plane into a city.

 

One of the two good things about the film.

and the other pair of good things about this flick.

Now it's not like Spider-Man is trying to stop some ticking time bomb or rescue a loved one from imminent death, and all these destructive acts are the consequence. No, he's simply chasing down thieves, led by The Vulture.

However, Peter Parker's recklessness eventually forces Tony Stark to take back the advanced suit, delivering the impactful line. And yet, Peter Parker dons his homemade Spider-Man costume a couple scenes later when he learns the Vulture has another heist planned, which results in the aforementioned plane scene.  

 

But Tony isn't mad about that one, cause Spider-Man got the bad guy this time. Ends justify the means I guess. I don't want to extrapolate without ruining the whole movie, but suffice to say, it's inexplicable that Tony is okay with Peter's actions, especially considering the events of the Civil War movie.

Thus thematically, there really is no arch. Peter doesn't learn about taking responsibility for his actions - he simply accomplishes a task without wearing the high tech suit Tony gave him. Peter's only real lesson in the movie is that he'd rather be a regular kid than an Avenger. 

Badass suit.

Badass entry. (stolen from Batman Begins)

In addition, how did he get his powers?, how does he train? how come he has no Spider fucking sense! that power is key to the character and instead all we get is an insecure kid looking for a father figure in an asshole that has caused the most disastrous problems in the MCU! God! I do hope Iron Man gets killed in the final installment of the Avengers films, I just can't stand how they try to make a complete asshat look cool just because he's rich and magically smart.

 

I know the Spider-Man origin story has been retold twice already, Once successfully in 2002, and one disgraceful in 2012 but yet what I feared in the trailers became the ultimate truth: out of complete desperation, producers forced Tony Stark's way into what could have been a truly refreshing debut film for the greatest Marvel Comics character there has ever been, and all we get is a big fucking yawn!

Before the Tony Stark scholarship.

After the Tony Stark scholarship.

And then there's the nitpicking.

Let's start with Flash Gordon, the classic "cool jock" who's a major asshole and bullies Peter throughout high school.

Well now he's not a jock at all. He's a "nerd" (in fact, literally every high school character in this film falls into the modern day millennial "nerd" category) who is still a major asshole and bullies Peter. He calls him "Penis Parker" and, well, that's about it. His character's sole purpose seems to be to remind the audience "hey, bullies can be smart academically- minded kids too!" Um, okay. Someone let me know if you know a kid on the Science Debate Team who leads chants of "Penis" as he DJs a house party to mock a classmate. I'm genuinely curious.

Then there's the girl Peter likes, who mostly ignores him but is on the same trivia team as Peter (Flash is also on this team, as is every other student you meet). Peter ditches her all the time, but for some reason he musters the courage to ask her out, and inexplicably she says yes. 

 

Don't mess with me kid!

Don't mess with him kid!

There's another girl named Michelle who's the resident loner (again, on the trivia team) who refuses to tour the Washington Monument in order to remind the audience that slaves built it. However, this completely contradicts with the "Make America Great Again!" sticker on her backpack.

That's a joke.

 

Overall, a popcorn movie. The trailers where pretty much the whole story and there really isn't anything likeable about Peter Parker's new friends. The teenager he plays is clearly on fast forward, up to a point where he's unbearable. I can clearly tell, producers wanted the Ultimate Spider-Man (from the animation) turned into a live action character. They failed, and so they have been failing since Avengers 2: Age of Ultron. The Captain America films are the only ones worth watching, the MCU is dead as fuck.

Here's the movie trailer collection featuring the best moments of a film that could have been great:

Captain America: Civil War

The best of 2016.

I said this before: out of every MCU films, the Captain America ones are the best of them all. His debut film, (Captain America: The First Avenger, not reviewed here for unknown reasons) planted the seed and with Captain America: The Winter Soldier my belief was clear, Marvel Studios hired the best team to honor the image of one of the most iconic superheroes of all time. Producers, writers and other personnel worked as hard as a rock and the actors & actresses that portrayed such iconic characters have done it masterfully time after time.

Captain America: Civil War, AKA, Captain America 3 proves with ease that they're not just looking for your money with a greedy drive. Instead, they get your money with care, with a developing story and characters that are written so well, they can grow each time we see them on screen. As I'm writing this entry, I've only watched Civil War once but, rest assured I'll watch it several more times (like I did with Episode VII, Deadpool and yes, Batman V Superman too) Behind a simple plot about concerned governments of the over empowered Avengers, lies the complexity of a group of characters that share the same ultimate aim but with different shades of gray. 

Fascism V/S Freedom.

There can only be one.

OK, but is this film about the super cool Civil War comic book?  

Seriously? I mean, really? at this point, it's clear that the MCU it's its own thing. Nonetheless, each MCU film borrowed a few things here and there from beloved comic book story arcs every fan boy treasures happily in their man cave (or bedroom, or whatever) 

Civil War picks up right after the events of Age of Ultron (hence, the Sokovia accords proposal book the U.N. are so eager to have the Avengers sign) If you've been following the MCU You already know the side effects of superhero battles, and I'm not just talking casualties and destruction, I'm also talking inner tension among the Avengers. Since, this movie is called Civil War, the only comic book related thing you'll find here is the fact that governments want superheroes to be under control of the U.N. which, in a way, resembles what happened in the comic book story arc (The Superhero Registration Act) Of course, not every superhero that made it to the comic book (brilliantly written by Mark Millar and penciled by Steve McNiven in 2006) made it to the movie for the reason explained in the paragraph above. In addition, some battle sequences were directly brought to life from the pages of the comic book. 

Tension between the leads (Captain America & Iron Man) had already been established since the first Avengers movie and boy they burst here!  Captain America stands for "we have freedom to decide when and how to proceed" while Iron Man stands for "we have to answer to somebody, it's best if we peacefully agree" Lines which could be translated as freedom V/S corporate pseudo fascist politics, at least that's the way I see it (you're free to think whatever you want, so you decide) Nevertheless, just like in the comic book, Tony Stark has a craving for being a control freak he can't simply quit just because. He wants to be the hero in control of the rest of the team, and let's be honest, Robert Downey Jr's performance here is fucking fantastic, he makes you either fucking hate him with your guts, or fucking love him with your heart. On the other hand, Captain America is the living breathing ultimate incarnation of self control, meaning he knows to do what's right, and that he trusts others will follow the example. 

Fascist control freak team.

Freedom fighters.

In Civil War, Tony Stark's portrayal is an accurate mix of several story arcs where he disguises as someone doing what's right for everyone while the truth is he's doing what's best for him, which is taking control of other superheroes, while posing as a respected citizen if you get my point. To me, he's a dick, a fucking dick sucking some gigantic ass. He's got sever issues! he's violent, armed, over powered and perhaps the only hero that should be behind bars according to the Sokovia act ideals (you know he's caused more damage than any other hero in the MCU by doing what's wrong (meaning, by getting away with whatever the fuck he wants to not listening to anyone but himself) 

The Winter Soldier, is charged of bombing the U.N. convention center, so Tony Stark decides he has to stop Captain America and his team just because he's "protecting a criminal" And well, that could be a plot hole. How come Tony Stark, a super smart ass with all the technology in the world, cannot find the obvious real perpetrator behind this facade? 

Anyways, two teams form, and battle for what they believe is right but, from very different points of view, which ultimately, reveal the truth nobody want's to see: The Avengers were forced to become a team, and never really liked each other (Specially, rich fuck Stark v/s Steve Rogers)  after more revealing moments happen, it's clear the Avengers will forever change, and working together again won't seem easy, so for the Infinity Wars movies, we'll see a completely different team. 

Anger & martial arts do not get along.

Narcissist  superhero wannabe.

Tony Stark's team members are quite predictable as to how did they choose to sign the Sokovia act, instead of following the rougher road with the Captain. 

Let's check this brief description, so that you can see my point:

• War Machine: A soldier with no brains that follows order and never stops to think if doing what's right is any different from doing what's legal.
• Black Panther: He was fooled into thinking The Winter Soldier killed his father.
• Vision: He's Tony Stark's creation, so...
• Black Widow: She has a double agenda, she will never submit to shitty registration acts. 
• Spider-Man: He's a poor student and Stark buys him off with a scholarship and a new suit.

Now, let's take a look at Steve Rogers' team:

• Falcon: He knows the difference between what's right and wrong.
• The Winter Soldier: His recovering memory, allows him to see he was once on the good guys side. He wants to be on that side again.  
• Scarlet Witch: She knows the only fear she can control is hers, so freedom is her side.
• Hawk Eye: He's always done what's right. Why would he change that now?
• Ant-Man: He's befriended Falcon since their first encounter. A friend of my friend is my friend too!

Hey! I was in the movie too!

Fuck you! I'm who fans want to see!

Now, moving into the most hyped Civil War moment: Spider-Man's debut in the MCU! How was it? how was it?! Well, this is the first time ever, where we're actually seeing a more comic-book accurate Spider-Man. Tobey Maguire's wasn't that bad and the other emo guy, was just teenage shit. Tom Holland just nails the part with a natural talent, so I'm sure like me, you can't wait for his solo movie to debut ASAP. All his lines are mostly hilarious just like they're in the comic book. Also, the battle sequences are simply fantastic (yes, mostly CGI, but well done)  As for Black Panther's debut I'd say he has a modest role on Civil War. Nevertheless, I'm sure that is because his also set to star his own solo movie, but the basics are there, you know, where do you come from, who you are, why you do what you do and so on. Moreover, his battle scenes are very good, you can see he's skilled and holds a powerful armored suit hard to break. 

Another fantastic addition is the presence of Ant-Man. Specially, the battle scheme he & Hawk Eye have designed to attack team rich fuck, and let's not talk about his fantastic Giant-Man moment!

As for the presumed deaths in the movie, sure, there are deaths but not of any of the characters you'd expect, so, no, Captain America doesn't die here despite having Crossbones in the bad dudes list.However, there is a funeral scene (hinted in trailers, TV Spots and leaked photos) but it's about something else entirely.

 

Super powered beauty.

You've got a friend?

Overall, Captain America: Civil War is a fantastic movie, a masterpiece, as good as Captain America: The Winter Soldier or even better! For naysayers, the rumor Tony Stark spends too much on screen time, while Steve Rogers is merely there, they're fucking feeding internet trolls! This is a Captain America movie! and it could have easily replaced the god awful and derivative Age of Ultron. For those thinking yeah but is it better than Batman V Superman? man! stop the crap! different movies, different comic book firms BUT same fans! let's enjoy these movies for what they are meant to do: entertain! if you want division, choose religion and crooked politics instead! 

Now, I know many comic book fans will address the movie as "not truly based upon the original Civil War story arc" Guys! I love comics, and I love movies too! there's no need to go scholar with a movie as good as this one. 

What about the after credits scene? Well, there isn't much going on with it, see it yourself. I for one, found it to be meh! 

What else can I say? Captain America: Civil War is another triumph for Marvel Studios, Disney, and for us the fans who, like Cyndi Lauper would put it, "fans just wanna have fun" and that's exactly what you're getting by watching this new entry in the succesfuly growing healthy, Marvel Cinematic Universe. 

Iron-Man cocksuckers, this movie is all about the Cap! As a matter of fact, I think you should all thank him for being such a good human being or else... 

Here's the movie trailer collection:

The original first trailer:

The second trailer:

And the third and final trailer:

Bonus! The TV Spot that features the Amazing Spider-Man!!

Spider-man, The Sam Raimi Trilogy

Admit it, these posters look awesome.

The world of the internet nerdom is all set in comic book mode since we're getting closer and closer to Avengers 2 Age of Ultron, so in order to level things up, we've decided to cover up all of the remaining based upon Marvel Comics characters films. So far we've reviewed a wide range of material featuring the old school classics:

1. The Amazing Spiderman 77-78 live action series 
2. Captain America 1979's TV movie 
3. Captain America II Death Too Soon 
4. Captain America The Movie
5. The Incredible Hulk's succesful TV serial 
6. The Incredible Hulk Returns  Featuring The mighty Thor.
7. The Trial of The Incredible Hulk featuring Daredevil.
8. Spiderman & His Amazing Friends cartoon.
9. The rare Japanese Toei No Supaidaman. 

But our blog is not only about nostalgia. We have also covered the lates entries in the Marvel cinematic universe:

1. The groundbreaking  first feature film of the Avengers 
2. The best Marvel cinematic sequel of them all Captain America: The Winter Soldier
3. The not so good Thor The Dark World
4. The death of a promising franchise with Ironman 3
5. The overrated Bryan Singer film that killed the legacy of classic comic book in X-Men Days Of Future Past
6. And a completely irrelevant reboot with The Amazing Spiderman

So as you can see, we have practically covered the entire Marvel cinematic universe, and just so you know, we're completing the list with the missing reviews for Hulk, The Incredible Hulk, Daredevil, X-Men, X-Men 2 United & X-Men 3 The Last Stand. I know you're wondering about Howard the Duck, the Fantastic Four, Ghost Rider & Elektra, but, seriously, did anyone enjoyed those shitty flicks? Oh, and what about Guardians of the Galaxy? yes, there will be a review for you daredevil completists. 

So, where to start? of course! the Sam Raimi Spiderman trilogy!

MJ nipples, must not fap!

The Green Goblin debuted in the first film of the trilogy.

The Spider-Man trilogy is a film series directed by Sam Raimi. The rights to further motion picture films based on Spider-Man were purchased in 1985 and moved through various production companies and studios, before being secured by Sony Pictures Entertainment(can you believe that? 12 years!) Sony hired Sam Raimi to direct Spider-Man (2002) and its sequels, Spider-Man 2 (2004), and Spider-Man 3 (2007). Through the films, Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) developed a relationship with his high school crush Mary Jane Watson (beautiful red head Kirsten Dunst), and as Spider-Man, battled villains such as the Green Goblin (Willem Dafoe), Doctor Octopus (Alfred Molina), the New Goblin (James Franco), the Sandman (Thomas Haden Church), and Venom (Topher Grace). The first two films were met with positive reviews from critics, while the third film met mixed reviews. While a sequel to Spider-Man 3 was in development, Sony announced that the franchise would instead be rebooted...

Spider-Man 2002

Spider-Man's first film follows Peter Parker, an orphaned high schooler who pines after popular girl-next-door Mary Jane Watson(man with that body of hers, who wouldn't?) While on a science class field trip, Peter is bitten by a genetically-engineered "super spider." As a result, Peter gains superhuman abilities, including increased strength, speed, and the abilities to scale walls and generate organic webbing. After his beloved Uncle Ben (Cliff Robertson) is murdered, a murder Peter could have easily prevented, the teenager realizes that he must use his newfound abilities to protect New York City. Meanwhile, wealthy industrialist Norman Osborn , the father of Peter's best friend Harry Osborn, subjects himself to an experimental performance-enhancing serum, which creates a psychotic and murderous split personality. Donning a military battlesuit, Norman becomes a freakish "Green Goblin", who begins to terrorize the city. Peter, as Spider-Man, now must do battle with the Goblin, all while trying to express his true feelings for Mary Jane.

This film was groundbreaking. Fantastic realistic special effects, incredible fight sequences, good acting and an interesting plot that continued to develop in the two sequels.

MJ Watson, precursor of the Free the Nipple campaign.

Too hot for school.

Spider-Man 2 2004

Spider-Man 2 picks up two years after the events of the first film. Struggling to balance both his superhero life and private civilian life, Peter still pines after Mary Jane, who is now engaged, and Harry continues to thirst for revenge against Spider-Man. As the stress of his dual life causes Peter's superpowers to wane, the hero must contend with the presence of Otto Octavius (Alfred Molina), a.k.a. Dr. Octopus, a mad scientist with four mechanical tentacles fused to his spine who sets out to recreate a dangerous fusion-based experiment that could destroy half of New York City. As the villain rampages across the city, Peter must choose between living the normal life he desires or committing to his responsibility to protect New York as Spider-Man. This sequel was praised as one of the best comic book adaptations of all times (until Christopher Nolan showed up with his Batman trilogy) 

Nevertheless, criticism about the Peter Parker character didn't take long to show up as he was depicted as a tormented soul bordering with being an Emo kid. 

Spider-Man 3 2007

Spider-Man 3 picks up months after the events of the second film. The film finds Peter basking in the spotlight as Spider-Man, and finding a balance between being a superhero and being with his love, Mary Jane Watson. Harry finally decides to take his revenge by setting up Mary Jane, then becomes the New Goblin like his father the original Green Goblin , and threatens the elements in Peter's life. Eddie Brock (Topher Grace), another photographer for the Bugle, sets out on a mission to defame Spider-Man and incriminate him. Flint Marko (Thomas Haden Church), an escaped convict, falls into a particle accelerator and becomes a shape-shifting sand monster later known as Sandman. He sets out to steal money for his chronically ill daughter. Peter later learns that Marko is the one that killed Uncle Ben, causing Peter's own dark intentions to grow. This vendetta is enhanced by the appearance of the mysterious black alien symbiotic substance that bonds to Peter, resulting in the formation of a new, jet-black costume. Once Peter separates himself from the alien, it finds a new host in the form of Brock, resulting in the creation of Venom.

This film would mark the end of the franchise due to negative reception worldwide. Personally, I think the film tried to copy Superman III formula: Good guy gone bad. As a matter of fact, the events in Spiderman 3 are way too similar with the above mentioned DC's finest.  Peter Parker, starts showing off, and as hero he goes berserk bordering the limits of a vigilante. The way he fights back the symbiotic suit is the same as Superman did: with the help of his loved ones. Once he's back to normal he makes the correspondent amends to save the day.

Sandman, New Gobling & Venom.

Not today Spidey.

Spider-Man 4 Cancellation & Reboot.

In 2008, Spider-Man 4 entered development, with Raimi attached to direct and Maguire, Dunst and other cast members set to reprise their roles. Both a fourth and a fifth film were planned and at one time the idea of shooting the two sequels concurrently was under consideration. However, Raimi stated in March 2009 that only the fourth film was in development at that time and that if there were fifth and sixth films, those two films would actually be a continuation of each other. James Vanderbilt was hired in October 2008 to pen the screenplay after initial reports in early 2008 that Sony Pictures was in contact with David Koepp, who wrote the first Spider-Man film. The script was subsequently rewritten by playwright David Lindsay-Abaire and rewritten again by Gary Ross in October 2009. Sony also engaged Vanderbilt to write scripts for Spider-Man 5 and Spider-Man 6.

Sony Pictures announced in January 2010 that plans for Spider-Man 4 had been cancelled due to Raimi's withdrawal from the project. Raimi reportedly ended his participation due to his doubt that he could meet the planned May 6, 2011 release date while at the same time upholding the film creatively; he admitted that he was "very unhappy" with the way Spider-Man 3 had turned out, and was under pressure to make the fourth film the best that he could. Raimi purportedly went through four iterations of the script with different screenwriters and still "hated it". Eventually, all of the previous plans for the failed sequels shaped what would be the Amazing Spiderman reboot films which nobody gives a fuck about because they're so very lame and unnecessary.

Multiple fapping options.

You should see the dentist more often.

Raimi's thoughts on the third and fourth film

"It really was the most amicable and undramatic of breakups: It was simply that we had a deadline and I couldn’t get the story to work on a level that I wanted it to work", he said of his split with Sony Pictures. "I was very unhappy with Spider-Man 3, and I wanted to make Spider-Man 4 to end on a very high note, the best Spider-Man of them all. But I couldn’t get the script together in time, due to my own failings, and I said to Sony, ‘I don’t want to make a movie that is less than great, so I think we shouldn’t make this picture. Go ahead with your reboot, which you’ve been planning anyway’".

He continued, "[Sony co-chairman] Amy Pascal said, "Thank you. Thank you for not wasting the studio’s money, and I appreciate your candor." So we left on the best of terms, both of us trying to do the best thing for fans, the good name of Spider-Man, and Sony Studios".

Spiderman no more.

 Now, let's move on to the trailer section: