Lo Squartatore Di New York: The New York Ripper

Get ready for a violent trip.

When it comes to finding a good horror film to enjoy late at night (not necessarily a la Netflix and chill) Italians did it first! The Giallo genre has spawned not only some of the best horror films of all times but also, some of the greatest film makers of our time. Lo Squartatore di New York aka New York Ripper (1982) outraged many horror film goers with its brutal uncompromising depiction of violence towards women (not that this was the only film to ever do that, let's remember I Spit On Your Grave). One of the most controversial giallos to come out of Italy. Lucio Fulci has filmed vicious scenes of violence before but New York Ripper takes the cake in violent imagery.  What makes the violent scenes for some tough to digest are the intense physical emotions of the murderer when killing his victims.

Gives new meaning to the term hardcore horror. Some of the most brutal depiction of hardcore horror I have witnessed in a horror film. Many of the film's contents have many similarities with Maniac(1980) which gained controversy for identical reasons. Daring approach by Fulci in making the hardcore horror moments both powerful and ugly. The director had guts in doing a giallo with an extremely unpleasant subject matter. Misunderstood Lucio Fulci film that is one of his finest horror films.

New York is not safe anymore.

See?

An aspect that either humored, shocked, or upset many people was the mock duck voice used by the murderer. I find that the duck voice of the killer adds to his menacing and sick presence. The duck voice of the murderer was a reference by the director to his earlier 1970s giallo, Don't Torture a Duckling(1972). A reference that is lost among some horror film enthusiasts. Capped what would be Lucio Fulci's second and final prosperous artistic period of his film career. The director's sole horror film with erotic overtones that adds to the controversial style of this pic.

Grim and relentless portrayal of human nature and its darkest aspects. The bleak nature of New York Ripper(1982) makes Lucio Fulci's gothic films look happy go lucky. Explodes with lots of anger and resentment that gives it a depressing feel. Dipped deep in nihilistic waters with the depressing portrayal of human behavior. The subplot involving the disabled little girl is uncomfortably sad.

New York Ripper(1982) is filled with some of the director's usual quirks and visual trademarks. Fulci's direction pushes the limit in scenes of sadistic violence. Sometimes part of the story seems to come from the gut of the controversial filmmaker. Direction does have some negative aspects but the negatives are few and far between. The direction of Lucio Fulci for New York Ripper(1982) is not as flashy or flamboyant as Dario Argento's direction of Tenebre(1982)(except in a few moments). He does get the job done with competence and craftsman experience.

a hand when you need it.

Silence! we're rolling.

Comparisons can be made between Lucio Fulci's New York Ripper(1982) and Dario Argento's Tenebre(1982). Both films deal with similar motifs and themes on violence towards women. Also, each film are gory uncompromising giallos with striking images. New York Ripper and Tenebre each have a show stopping moment of gory murder. These two films use bold film making techniques. Each changed some of the rules of the giallo genre.

There are many scenes that were controversial but the one that placed New York Ripper in film infamy was the infamous death scene of Daniela Doria. Two years for Daniela Doria after being part of another controversial scene in The Gates of Hell(1980). For a gruesome moment of vile violence it certainly has a excellent build up and pay off. As in Zombie Flesh Eaters(1979) the eye motif becomes a major part of this scene. Daniela Doria has to get kudos for acting in a difficult scene as this one. The merger of the erotic and the violent is what makes this particular scene hard to watch.

Got something in my eye.

a new level of penetration.

There is a small film noir quality within the frame of the story. This is because of the assortment of unsympathetic characters that surround it. The only person that comes close to having any moments of sympathy is Jane. Lt. Williams is an unlikable protagonist who comes out as arrogant and self centered. The character of Lt. Williams seems to be inspired by the close minded Police Detective of Let Sleeping Corpse Lie(1974). Dr. Davis comes out in the film as a narcissist who's too please with his intellect.

What turned off even some of the Lucio Fulci admirers was the realistic look of New York Ripper's violent scenes. Unlike in his gothic films from the same period there is no fantasy subtext to make the violence bearable. Its realistic elements help make New York Ripper(1982) into a courageous effort of fercious horror. The violence depicted towards women is what it is and that's disgusting but at the same time has a certain realism that doesn't make it totally misogynistic. New York Ripper moves away from the comic book feel of Fulci's gothic pictures and into the realism of his early 1970s giallo pictures. Its realistic depiction of violence is the film's biggest strength.

She's dead Jim.

Bloody murder.

Abel Ferrara made a little ribbing to the title of this film when the killer of Fear City(1985) is once referred to as New York Knifer. Two of the film's writers had worked with Fulci before on Don't Torture a Duckling. Unusually tightly plotted thriller which never clicks in a good flow in some moments. Excellent camera work created by Deep Red(1975) DoP, Luigi Kuveiller. Its not a perfect motion picture but for a bold horror film it certainly delivers the goods. 

Here's the movie trailer:

 

Emmanuelle

X was never like this.

Calling an erotic film a masterpiece is a rather bold move in the world of film connoisseurs and critics alike. Can a soft-core sex film become a trendsetter and spawn sequels, parodies and doppelganger flicks? And the most important question, can it live up to the extent of the myth created?

Emmanuelle is a 1974 French erotica film, starred by the then unknown Sylvia Kristel and directed by Just Jaeckin (actually a photographer debuting his directing skills) The film follows the steps of a recently married beautiful women that goes by the name of Emmanuelle. She's married to a diplomatic that's constantly traveling around the world for working reasons. Nevertheless, the day this man decides to settle comes in and takes his lovely wife to the exotic far away lands of Thailand. It is right there in the middle of spectacular settings that Emmanuelle will unleash her true sexual charisma in order to be a better woman to his very open minded husband.

So you're telling me there's big Thai cocks waiting for me in the area?

My God! I swallow semen like water!

Whether you like it or not this is a milestone in the history of cinema. Like Star Wars set new standards for Sci-Fi in mainstream cinema, Emmanuel set new standards for sexual oriented films.

Certainly the film was an amazing hit and box office records quickly tumbled. It is the most seen French film of all time and holds the record for the longest run at a single non-multiplex cinema (18 months in Paris, France). After this film sex on film was a completely different beast and many directors (new and old) used part of the template.

Anyone wanting a dirty movie will be sadly disappointed. Here sex is treated as natural, rarely earth shattering and almost matter-of-fact. The bedroom is only one of the locations where the act takes place - in fact I am surprised the participants weren't arrested! (while producing the film, the government of Thailand would deny filming permits due to its sexual nature, so producers came up with a mock family rated script that was never used, thus allowing them to film anyways)

So, how do you have fun in Bangkok?

a masturbation gathering!

Sylvia Kristel plays a newly married wife of 22 (19 in reality) with no previous film experience (this is no accident). Previously she had only appeared in commercials. She is the innocent who becomes corrupted, but it is a journey of corruption she is happy to take. Her nice-but-cold older husband is also all for it. The circumstances behind their marriage are not even touched upon - but maybe it was a marriage of convenience as he is a world traveling diplomat?

For a film aimed at men, men are rarely shown in a great light. Emmanuel finds she is bisexual and looks happier with women than with men - who commonly treat her as a sex object. If she appeared brighter she could even be viewed as a feminist icon, but even the high queen of feminism Germaine Greer says she is a "bimbo."

Lot of things are dated in this movie. The view of casual unprotected sex certainly. There is even a casual rape. But its use of third-world locations is a treat on the eye (on the big screen especially) and there is nothing substandard about the production. Even the music is first class and still does the rounds on its own.

Fucking on a plane!

Fucking in the plane's bathroom with a random stranger for the second time!

The photography is as good as you would see (an expect from a photographer directing) in a big budget epic. The film moves along at a slow but steady pace and you do look forward to finding out what happens next or how a situation is resolved.
Although this was one of the first productions of the mainstream cinema to deal with erotic subject-matter frankly, it is not particularly explicit. Much of the sexual action is implied, and what is shown directly is often shot from a distance. The eroticism of the film is softened by the way it is photographed. Outdoor scenes are shot in a blurry soft focus against a background of brilliant sunshine; indoor ones, by contrast, are generally dark or dimly lit. The leading actress, Sylvia Kristel, with her slim, boyish figure and the gentle beauty of her features, seems perfectly at home in this soft, unreal-seeming atmosphere. Nevertheless, there are still scenes that seem shocking even forty years on. One of Emmanuelle's lovers, Marie-Ange, is a teenage girl only dubiously of the age of consent, something that seems to have caused less consternation in the seventies than it would do today. (The actress who played her was in fact eighteen, but the intention seems to have been to make the pigtailed, lollipop-sucking Marie-Ange a bisexual Lolita figure). Emmanuelle's Thai houseboy, aroused by the sight of her and her husband making love, pursues and has sex with one of the housemaids. It is never made clear whether or not this is an act of rape; the boundary between consensual and non-consensual sex is blurred in a manner which I found distasteful. 

Naked beauty.

a smoking pussy? WTF?

Like certain other Continental erotic films of this period, the 'Emmanuelle' series is marked by a certain pseudo-intellectual pretentiousness. This is particularly apparent in the second half of this film when the heroine, after being jilted by one of her lesbian lovers (the oddly named Bee), takes up with the elderly Mario, a man who, despite his grey hair and advancing years, fancies himself both as a lover and as a thinker. The rest of the film is frequently punctuated by Mario's thoughts on the meaning of life, carefully enunciated in a deep, gravelly voice, somewhere between an Old Testament prophet and an Orson Welles sherry commercial, which gives them the air of oracular pronouncements. Sex, in Mario's philosophy, ceases to be a taboo and becomes a duty. One owes it to oneself, and indeed to the world in general, to experience physical pleasure in as many ways as possible, with as many partners as possible, and to liberate oneself from all ways of thinking that might hinder one from this aim. The consequence of not doing so is that one will fail in one's solemn and sacred duty to Live Life To The Full.

It is this sort of Existentialism-Lite, Sartre meets Hugh Hefner, that makes the film seem so dated today, far more than do trivial period details such as Jean's sideburns or the garish lime-green paintwork of his sports car. This sort of cod-philosophy became one of the first casualties of the AIDS epidemic. If we watch 'Emmanuelle' today, it is not as an erotic experience, despite the undoubted charm of its heroine, and certainly not as an intellectual one, but as a slight, inadvertently amusing period piece. So, if you're not into this particular kind of film, you may find yourself with friends having a party while the film runs as background "erotic campiness"

Girl on Girl action.

Inter racial live sex!

Anyways, the film did so well that it spawned not only one but 5 sequels! and we're not counting the porn sequels and many unofficial sequels. Honestly, watching the original film would do more than enough for those who have never watched an Emmanuelle film. As above mentioned, the film tries to hard to tell us that rich people, and especially rich cool people have developed a new intellectual trend where the "sex for everyone" label becomes the motif that justifies the entire film from start to finish. Still, such intellectual trend is not developed very smartly I might add. For instance, do you really believe a couple of newlyweds would want to have sex with other people as to make their husband/wife glad? I for one, don't think so. Also, Emanuelle is so in love that she's willing to fuck underage girls, share lesbian sex with people she's barely met before and most importantly, go out with an old fart and end up having sex with unknown men in the middle of an illegal fight contest? Certainly not! not even the most open minded person in the world would do it as easy as 1,2,3. Nevertheless, We know this film is what I call "Sex Science Fiction" In addition, we also know the augmented reality on how the characters behave is just there to justify an erotic film with nice photography and good looking women (not those who look like retired pornstars)

A pity this film hasn't aged as good as other erotic films have. This is history in the making, but then again, it requires a lot of understanding and scholar knowledge on the eye of the beholder in order to see the potential this film had and still has despite its many flaws. Later in 1975, the inevitable sequel would premiere (we will review it next) and finally in 1977 the Goodbye Emmanuelle film would find our heroine finding true love has nothing to do with fucking everything that moves. so if I had to recommend a film besides the original I'd say part 3 pretty much corrects all the erotic campiness and becomes a much more enjoyable film in an overall feel.

Best friends, masturbate together.

The German VHS cover.

 Here's the original film trailer:

 Emmanuelle's Theme song:

Histoire d'O The Story of O

She became a sex goddess for love.

Talk about long time no see! Lately our blog has been highly conservative only reviewing bland films but it was about time we returned to our exploitation nature, so here you have it Histoire d'O AKA The Story of O, a 1975 sexploitation film based upon the novel written by Pauline Reage. What's really funny about this French/German/Canadian production is that had the now world famous E.L. James (author of the Fifty Shades Of Grey book trilogy) had the chance of watching this film, I'm positive she wouldn't have sold her rights to the god awful producers that ended up delivering a summer love story for teens that lacked what made her books so popular among the ladies. Anyways, today's entry guarantees a return to the very essence of our cult movies blog: sexploitation! and boy we have plenty of films on the way! Films in the likes of the 1969 Japanese sex art film "Go Go Second Time Virgin", "The Japanese Wife Next Door" sex comedy, and many great French erotica films are just around the corner, so you better stay tuned to SPAM-Alternative, the only site that's been delivering uncensored & uncompromising reviews since 2008 (that's 7 years!)

All I want is to make my boyfriend happy.

Two dicks are better than one!

Following his spectacular commercial as well as begrudging critical success with the landmark EMMANUELLE, photographer turned filmmaker Just Jaeckin tried his hand at another erotic literature adaptation. Published in 1954, "Histoire d'O" caused an immediate scandal – which drove the curious to the book stores – with its single-minded first person account of a young woman's voluntary debasement to please her insecure lover, evolving into a more equally based power relationship with the sophisticated elderly mentor to whom she is passed on. Its author "Pauline Réage" was clearly pseudonymous and who was really responsible proved a fertile source for speculation, a particularly persistent possibility being idiosyncratic director Alain Robbe-Grillet who would dabble (with wife Catherine, under the joint "nom de plume" Jean de Berg) in the S&M field with "L'Image", ironically also filmed that year in a beautiful borderline hardcore version by Radley Metzger. Finally, the culprit came clean herself – for, yes, it indeed was a woman – in 1992, revealing herself to be respected writer and translator Dominique Aury (whose real name was Anne Desclos), who had penned the novel as an angst-ridden love letter to her considerably older paramour Jean Paulhan, an esteemed member of the Academie Française, whose sophistication both overwhelmed and terrified her. Retaining much of the book's matter of fact prose through effective voice over, supplying the voice "O" willingly surrenders, HISTOIRE D'O proves Jaeckin's high watermark as an erotic entrepreneur.

This is a very special kind of secret society.

Where women learn to service men 24/7.

Never given a proper character name beyond the single letter she adopts with implications of both nothingness and infinity, "O" (engagingly portrayed by exquisite Corinne Cléry, memorably ripped apart by Dobermanns in minor Bond MOONRAKER) humors lover René (cult favorite Udo Kier) by accepting an extended stay at the Château of Roissy, a secluded environment designed for the education of women – by their own volition, stressed at every turn – into a life of submission as the ultimate expression of love. Dressed in flowing robes that allow easy entry to whoever feels so inclined, "O" becomes part of a silent sisterhood whose utter servitude instills them with innate strength, available to all men yet belonging to none. Her personal manservant Pierre (longtime character actor Jean Gaven, impressive as one of the assumed villains in Jean Becker's masterpiece L'ETE MEURTRIER, coincidentally another film relying on extensive narration to get its point across) doles out daily punishment but relinquishes his power when he falls in love with his charge.

Care for some pussy?

A good woman knows her man.

Once her "training" is complete, "O" returns to her real world occupation as fashion photographer, grooming stuck up model Jacqueline (gorgeous Li Sellgren, also in Jaeckin's MADAME CLAUDE) for René's benefit and a subsequent stay at Roissy. It soon becomes clear that "O" has already outgrown her only outwardly unconventional lover, summoned by his "tutor" Sir Stephen (former British matinée idol Anthony Steel, no stranger to "naughty" credits as he appeared in both of James Kenelm Clarke's Fiona Richmond vehicles HARDCORE and LET'S GET LAID) who has become intrigued by this strangely subservient girl wielding power over his pupil. Equipped with fearsome black housekeeper Norah (imposing Laure Moutoussamy, star of occasional gay pornographer Norbert Terry's COUCHE-MOI DANS LE SABLE ET FAIS JAILLIR TON PETROLE !), sophisticated Sir Stephen will push her boundaries even further, with the physical souvenirs (pierced labia and branded initials, again by her own choice) to prove it. To this end, he sends her to live with the deceptively kind Anne-Marie (a tremendous performance by Christiane Minazzoli, by then a mainstay in French films for over two decades) in a comforting girls only environment that would seem like a walk in the park after Roissy. Without men for distraction however, the women will dig their claws into each other for top spot in their mistress' favor. Watch for several skin flick starlets during this extended episode, like Albane Navizet (star of Jean-François Davy's LE DESIR a/k/a INFIDELITES), Nadine Perles (from Eddy Matalon's LA CHATTE SANS PUDEUR) and especially Martine Kelly as tomboy Thérèse. Not a soft porn siren per se, Kelly had totally charmed audiences in her debut as the Scottish lass coveted by Olivier De Funès in Jean Girault's affable LES GRANDES VACANCES. Over time, she would amass a consistently engaging body of work in movies as diverse as Samy Pavel's distinctly odd and now virtually impossible to see MISS O'GYNIE ET LES HOMMES FLEURS and the period melodrama LES MAL PARTIS by…Sébastien Japrisot, who adapted novel to screenplay for "O". Coincidence ? 

Please don't cum inside, I want that spunk all over my tits.

I could use a cunni lingus right now.

It's amazing what a little – okay, a lot of – surface gloss could do to sneak contentious material past the censors circa 1975. One has to bear in mind that this played regular theaters rather than the "specialized circuit" and, literary pedigree notwithstanding, this is one diabolically dirty movie, even with most graphic components eloquently left to imagination. Revered DoP Robert Fraisse, who continues to work on both sides of the Atlantic to this very day (doing exemplary work on the Nick Cassavetes' ingratiating period piece THE NOTEBOOK for example), imbues the luxurious interiors with ominous grandeur in line with the dispassionate ritual approach Sir Stephen and his acolytes take to justify their apparently debauched goal, the dank coldness of Roissy contrasting effectively with the warm hues of the Anne-Marie segment. As with EMMANUELLE, late pop chart topper Pierre Bachelet contributes a richly varied score which proved a bestseller on vinyl, an obligatory auditory accoutrement in middle class households back in the day. Only slightly less successful than its predecessor, yet a far more ambitious and accomplished work, HISTOIRE D'O also proved something of a private obsession for producer Eric Rochat, who would return to the material time and again with a peculiar sequel (pretentiously subtitled CHAPITRE II, which he helmed himself) with Dutch actress Sandra Wey who was no Sylvia Kristel and a ten episode miniseries starring Brazilian bombshell Claudia Cepeda. Neither of these in any way tarnishes the ebullient effect the extremely erotic original still exudes over four decades down the line.  

I'm dripping wet already!

My oh my!

Overalll, The Story of O, like many other sexploitation films is clearly a must watch and a must have in any decent connoisseur video library. Films like this one are not made anymore and I don't think censorship has anything to do with it. Current film makers, actors & producers just don't have the balls to come up with something as straightforward as this. Hence, that is why I will always advice people who wants to start watching erotic films to look back to the 70's & early 80's to find true master pieces in the genre. The only modern exception I can think of is the Nymphomaniac two volume film made in 2013 by Lars Von Trier although the film isn't as daring as we're led to think in the trailer. 

On a side note, we have to remember these are just movies, they're neither instruction manuals nor they're a sexual behavior documentary. Watching can clearly mislead the viewer into thinking woman is a mere sexual object during the whole film. Don't forget the lady author of the novel wrote it purposely that way as a manner of a vendetta from a former boyfriend. In addition, I support E.L. James and her erotic books for the ladies, it was about damn time they had their own erotic world. Unfortunately, haters, trolls and stupid conservative people are always out there, and to them are the closing words of today's review: go fuck yourselves, we live in a free world and sex is what makes us human, stop demonizing it! again, kill yourselves with your middle ages religious beliefs, fucking fuck you. Fuck you good!

Here's the movie trailer:

Robocop 3

Back for all audiences.

Hello fellow connoisseurs who still read. Previously I had promised a review for "Aliens" and guess what? I didn't keep my word, bad dog, bad dog. Anyways, let's just say such review will be here sooner than later due to some unexpected infatuation: Robocop! My favorite childhood cop. A few weeks ago my wife asked "hey, why don't we watch Robocop again?" so, what started as only watching the original film, ended up in revisiting the whole trilogy plus the infamous TV series from 1994 & 2001. The final installment in the trilogy came three years after Robocop 2 & the tone producers had us used to (you know, good old bloody gory violence) in the first two films was gone forever. Which, in my case was an excellent thing as I could finally go to the theater and be a part of Robocop 3 premiere (I was still an underage kid, and boy, I went on my own to watch it!) 

Robocop 3 (1993) picks an unknown number of years after the events of part 2, Cain's gang and his Nuke Drug has been obliterated and Robocain has been defeated by our hero. The Old Man from the previous two films is gone (either died or resigned after the events of Robocop 2; the movie doesn't say) and is replaced by the "CEO" (Rip Torn). The Delta City Project inaugurated in the previous film is falling behind schedule and OCP incurs in debt, leading to its takeover by the Japanese corp. of Kanemitsu. Meanwhile, they adopt increasingly forceful methods to get back on track by hiring mercenaries called "the Rehabs" led by Robert McDagget (John Castle) to evacuate areas for demolition and send the locals to "correctional facilities". A band of freedom fighters spring up, Robocop and Anne Lewis track them down after seeing a little girl joining them in an abandoned church. Unbeknownst to them, the Rehabs have tracked them down, and orders them to leave the building to them. Robocop and Anne Lewis refuse, but when Anne gets seriously injured (and dies a few minutes later), he quits the force and joins the rebellion, while undergoing structural repairs in his programme.

The Detroit riot.

Why is it whenever they add a kid in a film, the story sucks?

Robocop 2 may have shocked some viewers for its excessive violence, but it is better than this one. The storyline is more coherent than the last film in the sense that all main ideas make it to the end but it's too simplistic. While Part 2 was ultra-violent and gloomy, this one went into the opposite direction. Sure the absence of the first two films' graphic violence would make it more appealing for kids, but this movie just has little to make up for it; it starts off very promising but it gets sillier as the it progresses, culminating in a ridiculous fight between Robocop and the Samurai, which is a far cry from the excellent finale between Robocop and Robocain in the the second movie, giving the impression that the filmmakers have run out of money by that point.

However, Robocop 3 still has some worthwhile moments to spare it from becoming a candidate for MST3K. Most of the action sequences save the aforementioned fight are well-staged and creative, and the film has some creative use of CGI. Robocop's new gadgets-- the jet-pack and his cannon-- are worthy additions, and our hero still knows how to make an entrance (diving from the highest level of a parking lot and dropping down 10 storeys below).

Peter Weller, however, did not reprise the role, most likely because he has grown tired of having to walk into that baggy costume for hours and hours on end and sweating buckets in the process, and he's replaced by Robert John Burke. Burke is a worthy successor to Weller, mimicking his movements down to the smallest details, but it just doesn't feel the same without him.

Can you fly bobby?

I've been upgraded to Windows 3.1!

Now I won't say that Robocop 3 is the mega disaster that a lot of reviewers call it. I mean Robocop 3 lost the benefit of being an eighties action film so granted the violence and foul language would be toned down because suddenly the political correctness of the 90's was in full swing. So that meant making Robocop more family friendly. They also lost Peter Weller from the lead which I didn't realize how great he was as Robocop until he wasn't him anymore. I have to wonder if screenplay writer Frank Miller was angry at the creators of Robocop so he spun this tale as a cruel prank because Miller is no slouch at writing, he is a legendary comic writer (Batman,300, Sin City, X-Men, etc.) and the story for Robocop 3 borders on ridiculous. All of the dark gritty atmosphere is pretty much gone from the original film, the tongue in cheek political humor is gone as well despite some off attempts to do exactly that. And it is true what reviewers have said that Robocop has suddenly become a complete weakling. He spends so much of the film repeatedly falling on his robo butt and trying to get back up. He's lost all of his cool factor, all of his heavy hitting super hero instincts.

So here is why Robocop 3 is NOT the disastrously horrendous film that some make it out to be. First of all it ends the trilogy with a final big battle between OCP and the Detroit Police Department which essentially brings OCP down. It also brings back some of the familiar faces from the series and gives closure to the story on Lewis although her and Burke just don't have the chemistry that her and Weller had as partners. The story is decent enough and simple enough to follow but it just doesn't hold up to the previous two films. The entire aspect of Robocop flying is so ridiculous and they surely had to know that it was ridiculous. If it ain't broke don't fix it and they do fix the unbroken recipe which essentially ruins the series. It is true that Robocop 3 was a fall from grace and this film felt like the quality of a TV Movie which is maybe why all future Robocop installments hit Television. A rather bland disappointment.  

Robocop 3 (Super Nintendo)

Robocop 3 (NES)

All in all, a sequel for the fans of  Robocop only. Casual Sci-Fi fans skip this unless you've already watched the first two films that built our robo hero character with far greater justice than the final piece in the trilogy. Still, we can't be that hard on it, many things were going on during the creation of the sequel. This film was wrapped in 1991 (only a year after the sequel) but due to Orion (the production company) having some substantial financial issues that eventually led them to bankruptcy, the film was on hold for a couple of years. 

The PG-13 is not a random choice. it was deliberate as the film producers wanted to establish Robocop in a kids friendly world (beyond "Robocop Ultra Police" the awful cartoon which spawned the very first wave of Robocop action figures) so that they could ask their parents for the cool Robocop 3 merchandise (mostly action figures, weapon accesories and vehicles) In addition, Peter Weller grown tired of the character and didn't give a shit about reprising his role anymore. Also, Nancy Allen felt the exact same way about her character, and the only way she would reprise it was under the condition that she died in the first half hour of the film (she got away with it)

Here's the movie trailer:

Here the Robocop action figure TV ad: