Cinderella 2000

The future never looked less promising!

Just when you thought we couldn't hit a new low (our previous review) we surprise again with another sleazy space opera: Cinderella 2000! a futuristic retelling of the classic tale featuring robots, fascist laws, dance moves, low budget costumes and lots of T & A! Directed by B-movie veteran Al Adamson & written by Budd Donnelly, this 1977 flick promises to deliver the answer to "Will there still be sex in the XXI century?"  

We always recall the 70's as a decade of creative freedom and yet repression towards gay people and other minorities was still hitting hard on people who wanted to express and live their sexual freedom. Cinderella 2000 can be best described as a softcore sci-fi musical satire. While the essence of the classic Cinderella tale is still there, the film chooses a questionable approach to the problems of governmental and community sexual oppression from the 70's but places them in the now not so distant future year of 2047. 

Cinderella knows a cumshot can save the world.

Fancy sexy suits from the future!

Unlike sophisticated satires that draw parallels the world on the screen and the world as it exists, Cinderella 2000 glosses over real issues (from the 70's) and misrepresents the serious nature of the problem: For instance,  the fascist ruler of this period, The Controller (Erwin Fuller), is portrayed as a silly clown instead of a villainous dictator; the populace, for whom the joys or sex are as much a mystery as the particulars of the act, is not treated sympathetically; and the only kind of political statement the movie attempts to make is "We all need love". 

Most outrageous of all, however, is the fairy-tale like solution offered. Cindy,  played by Catharine Erhardt, has a dream come true  when she seduces her prince charming Tom Prince (Vaughn Armstrong), at a governmental ball aided by her fairy godfather (Jay Larson). Realizing suddenly that sex is good (yeah, right) Tom, who conveniently happens to be The Controller's number one guy, convinces the dictator to lift the sex ban and allow the populace to enjoy the pleasures of sex.  Thus, thanks to the downtrodden miss and her fairy godfather, everyone in 2047 lives happily ever after. Unfortunately, the very real prison sentences faced by First Amendment defenders Larry Flynt & Al Goldstein in 1977, couldn't be set aside with the power of a magic wand. 

Raise your hand if you want dick!

Continue fucking, we're here for your safety only.

Of course, the makers of this film met a very different destiny to that of Mr. Flynt & Mr. Godstein because even maestro Russ Meyer made far more graphic films than this one. Cinderella 2000 is all about T & A with no explicit sex and no split beavers. Even the technical aspects of this film are mediocre: The soft-rock soundtrack is poor, the lyrics and dialog are weak, and the costume and set designs barely give the impression of the future. If there were laws for punishing bad film makers, I'm sure jails would be over crowded and Hollywood and its imitators would be a far smaller business with legally controlled budgets but that is pure fiction, of course. 

If you're planning a party with friends, I'm sure here's another background film you can play while everyone's drinking and dancing to cool music while this senseless two hour and 20 something minute films goes unnoticed by your family, friends and even yourself. 

Daft Punk from 2047.

Musicals and sex. What a great idea!

This movie was a typical low-budget Al Adamson sci-fi flick. Now, to be fair, let's take a look at some of the few highlights the film has: Most of the actors were sub-par, with the exception of Sherri Coyle. She is absolutely gorgeous in the opening scene with Art Carcaro as they attempt to figure out how to make love. Her body is curvaceous, her hair long and silky and her eyes sultry. She makes you wish you were there with her. Then Roscoe the Robot and his stormtroopers barge in, catching Sherri and Art "in the act". The poor things are then taken away for punishment.
 

Highlight 1: While in the Reduction Chamber, and after the silly video from the Central Controller, Adamson manages to sneak in a subtle hint of lesbianism in Stella, the reducer. While preparing Sherri for reduction, Stella deliberately and flirtatiously disrobes Sherri by removing her plastic bubble wrapping covering, revealing her beauty. Stella is loving every minute of this! While Sherri turns to Art and struggles to comprehend what is about to happen to her, Stella softly touches Sherri's face and turns Sherri's head in her direction as if to say, "It will be okay. I'll take care of you". Too bad the scene then breaks away to other nonsense. I would have liked to see it develop more.

More music & robots.

a furry future.

Highlight 2: After more nonsense, we then return to the Reduction Chamber and Sherri is all beautifully laid out on the reducing table, completely nude. I found this highly arousing. (So did Sherri - her nipples are erect.) The door to the Chamber opens, Roscoe returns and he orders the reduction of Sherri to "Proceed". Sherri just lays there, shakes her head and closes her eyes, thinking, I can't believe this is happening to me! She is totally vulnerable. Stella then flicks some dials on her console and then looks at Sherri as she pulls the lever to begin Sherri's reduction. Adamson was smart enough to give us an overhead view of Sherri's reduction and as we watch her beautiful figure shrink to about 12 inches in height. She looked beautiful throughout. It is too bad we don't see what happens to her after this scene. She unfortunately is "reduced" right out of the plot. It is also too bad that Adamson didn't have other scenes with other babes getting reduced in the Chamber.

Here's the movie trailer. Pay close attention to the promising narration:

Space Thing

Visit the planet of the rapes!

I always had a feeling Star Trek (the original series) sorta had a hidden (or not so hidden) sex charge. I mean, the costumes of most of the female characters always left little to the imagination. Futuristic mini-mini skirts, side boob dresses and skin tight fabrics were clearly a sign of a promising future in space with beautiful in shape women taking man where no man did ever go before.Obviously, everyone dreamed of these girls and some clever ones decided to build their own futuristic space adventures where there was plenty of women.Believe it or not, space sex films have been around for quite some time. As a matter of fact, today's entry will take us straight into the groovy 60's!

Space Thing, is a 1968 cult film directed by Byron Mabe (as B. Ron Elliot) and starred by Karla Conway (a playboy girl from the same year) Steve Vincent, Merci Montello & Cara Peters. The film runs for 69 minutes (no pun intended) and it's clearly the Star Trek sex charged spoof episode everyone dreamed of in the 60's. As a matter of fact, the outdoor scenes were filmed in the same place some Star Trek episodes were! talk about being a kinky trekkie!

 

Captain Mother's crew.

Col. Granilla meets the man.

It's the year 2069; Col. Granilla (Vincent) is a Planetarian (alien), an alien in human disguise so that he can infiltrate the space ship of Captain Mother (Peters), whose crew is basically made up of females that like to strut around in little clothing. These Terranians (humans) really confuse and disgust him in the way they perform their intimate ways, as most of the girls have really got it for Granilla and the feisty lesbian Captain Mother doesn't like the idea of her girls getting it on with men. So he becomes caught up in a tussle between Captain Mother, a couple girls and one of the two men who's incredibly jealous of his intentions. But there's more a greater purpose for him being on the ship and that's to stop them reaching his planet (yes, this is true despite all the T & A) 

Oh boy this should be a true stinker, just look at the film's outline. True I didn't know what I was getting myself into, but this inter-galactic, exploitation z-grade production has some sort of trashy appeal to it, because you won't see anything quite like it. That appeal would be in the slightest of doses, though. This surely would've been rated one of the worst films of all time if not for its exploitative context which is why it probably went by unnoticed. It's bad, real bad but entertaining in certain aspects of this awfulness and amateur set-up. On this occasion I would say its one of those times when the commentary on the DVD outdoes the actual feature. 

The story takes place on board spaceship Erection.

In the future we'll sit in thrash cans.

The producer David F Friedman spends the beginning talking up how bad it is and I tend to agree with him when he claims that 'Plan 9 from Outer space' has a new contender, and it really makes Plan 9 look like an epic, yep that's true. I'm not exaggerating! What we get here is buckets of female nudity and soft-core sexual acts. There's definitely no innuendo going one here! 

To begin with is a drawn out prologue involving man reading Sci-fi stories while his wife is complaining about that's all he does and she's sexually depraved. Well, not too long we get our first sexual play and then it moves into its nude space story that he might be dreaming about. It's either focusing on its cheap looking sets or that of the woman who are basically in little clothing, if none at times. Oh that might be great, but hell at times it got a bit tedious with the same old shots and actions occurring. Really, there's little if no plot but to stage one sexually passionate act and some ladies walking and lazing about in the nude after another. They seem to find an opportunity to just shove it in the film. Although don't expect it to be rather erotic, because it doesn't really have that effect. But who's to complain when the woman involved in this skin flick are rather ravishing to say the least. That especially goes to the busty Captain Mother who loves her lesbian action and (tamely) sadistic pleasure. Also were given a tongue in cheek narration, which flows throughout the feature and actually will raise a chuckle if you let it. I thought this one was of its better things, among the bad. 

I smell wet clit here.

Space pubes!

The goofy script is better off, as it plays for a comedy and it does have some moments. The way this comes across as, it's like a parody on people having sex for the first time. Well, more so a parody on sex and love education for aliens. But the actual plot is nothing but little set pieces, which are set-up to prolong the running time, that's why some do come across rather repetitive and tedious. Really nothing does come off together. Well, it's mentioned on the commentary that they had a time limit to reach and with no real story, it was always going to be a hard ask to complete.

The budget really shows. Cheap, that's very cheap. That's even if they had one? If I remember correctly the producer said on the commentary the budget was something just under $40. Yeah, I can believe that! As technically the shaky foundation is household items, with cardboard and model sets. Some props are just laughably bad that it looks all primitive with toys and conjured up items hanging by strings. The imagination truly blew me away… I wish. The only thing that had an ounce of freshness might have been how they staged the opening credits. But everything else is just plain horrifyingly inane from the soundtrack that's all over shop that it resembles that of cheesy elevator music to the disjointed and weirdly style of editing and the very intrusive camera-work that didn't venture away from its few and usual frames and angles. The constant heavy breathing during moments involving the characters getting it on had me questioning was that on camera or behind it? Both I say.

Sci-Fi over sex?

Clever opening credits.

The effects (maybe that's an overstatement?) are another story, as the explosion to end the story off seem to be out of time by already being on fire before exploding. It's a whopper! Also that spaceship, called the erection was a dish… I think (?) and sometimes seamlessly it didn't fit the size ratio that it's supposed be when on screen. There's even a moment involving a person going out to see if a planet is safe enough for them to leave their spaceship, but when he leaves the ship by it's door, there's no airlock. Therefore, possibly releasing dangerous gases into ship. Oh heck, forget about this as it was the limitations that caused this trash, but lovable trash… to some agrees;) Maybe I spent too much time on this, so I'll wrap it up.

Star Trek was huge back in the sixties, and so was Flash Gordon a decade earlier (the 70's would spawn its own parody with Flesh Gordon) and oh well, Star Wars is still great and even the galaxy far, far away has received the parody treatment in the porno genre. Maybe the one thing that would make this 60's flick is the fact that it was inspired by a quality science fiction series that did play here and there with sexual innuendo but, due to TV regulations couldn't go any further in the T&A department so, if you're like me, say, motivated to see what other trekkies thought about when the lights went out in the Enterprise, Space Thing, could be an interesting re imagining of Gene Roddenberry's universe.

Futuristic Bush.

Dicks are bad for your cunt!

Yes, this is a bad movie. Its cheaper than "Plan 9 From Outer Space" and "Teenagers From Outer Space" combined, features horrible acting, a screenplay which makes you wonder if the writers were in a right state of mind, and an overall feeling of tawdriness. Fortunately, its a good bad movie. Besides, unlike Ed Wood who had a lot of enthusiasm for his projects, the makers of this will readily admit that its a piece of crap that exists for the sole purpose of getting nudity on-screen. And when the final product is this entertaining and bizarre, I really don't care.

Like I said above, this is a cheap movie. The interiors of the rocket consist of about three in studio sets, the planet they land on at the end is clearly just some desert in California, and the explosions in particular are obviously pasted in later. The dialog and situations are all stereotypical softcore porn scenarios, and they're absolutely riotous. Anyone whose truly politically incorrect at heart will be in hysterics at the incredibly outdated sexism. The characters are all stock types, my favorite being the male cadet who brings to mind a young Bobcat Goldwaith.

Captain Mother knows she's the tits.

Let me diddle that skittle for you captain.

Most of all though, these nude films are unique, which is the main appeal to me. Its a cliché to say they don't make them like they used to, but that's entirely the case here. The color schemes are eye catching and almost pop art (even though that's a more pretentious label than Friedman would ever want), and bring to mind some of John Waters' early classics (the melodramatic dialog is great as well). Past the rather innocent sexual situations, the theme of the space race dates this incredibly. Its kind of like "Flesh Gordan", except even dumber and since the actors never wink at the camera, its a lot more fun than that famous midnight movie. How much you enjoy this film all depends on how intrigued or turned off you are by the plot description.

SPACE THING is one of the best known sexploitation films out there but I honestly don't see why. I guess the science fiction might bring a few people to the film who wouldn't normally watch these softcore films but there's very little here in regards to entertainment. The film was obviously shot on a shoestring budget but this adds some campy charm and especially with the ultra cheap sets. The film also manages to load up on the beautiful women and as you'd expect there's non-stop nudity from start to end.

Say, wanna suck some dick?

Hey! take it easy! I didn't force her to swallow!

Nude in space with gallons of tempting female flesh and campy dialogue, that's about it. Nothing more and nothing less. 

Here's the Something Weird official movie trailer:

 

Nighthawks

There is no security.

The other day while browsing in The Six Million Dollar Man & The Bionic Woman Fanpage, someone posted a picture of a film I hadn't seen featuring Lindsay Wagner. To my surprise, the film was starred by Sylvester Stallone & Rutger Hauer, two heavy weight actors from the 70's/80's, so I instantly decided to search for Nighthawks, a 1981 action thriller masterpiece I now officially include in my top 50 of the greatest films I've ever watched, and I mean it. 

Directed by Bruce Malmuth (also director of Hard to Kill, The Karate Kid Part II & Pentathlon) and the uncredited Gary Nelson (director of cult film The Black Hole & legendary series Get Smart from 1966 to 1969) with a marvelous story written by David Shaber (Writer of 1979's cult film The Warriors) Nighthwaks may be the definitive terrorist film from the 1980's and perhaps, from all decades if you're into these kind of films. Stallone delivers a fantastic performance in a character that's far more vulnerable and believable (for that matter) than his immortal Rocky & Rambo.

DaSilva & Fox, two though N.Y. cops.

Heymar 'Wulfgar' Reinhardt.

Conservative street cop DaSilva (Sylvester Stallone) reluctantly agrees to terminate an international terrorist (Rutger Hauer) who has demanded media attention. But DaSilva's "at-home" tactics are very much put to the challenge.

The story was originally intended to be produced as "The French Connection III" by screenwriter David Shaber at Twentieth Century Fox, with Gene Hackman's Popeye Doyle teamed up with a wisecracking cop (tentatively Richard Pryor). When Hackman was reluctant to make a third film as Doyle, the idea was scrapped; Universal acquired the rights to the storyline, which Shaber reworked into "Nighthawks", the more you know!

Troubles continued on set, due largely to Stallone having creative control. Stallone, through producer Herb Nanas, picked out his own cinematographer (usually the director's job). When he disagreed with the original director on certain plot points, the director was fired and replaced by Bruce Malmuth. This further caused issues because not only was Malmuth piecing together someone else's work, he was fairly new as a director and actually gave out too much direction, stressing some actors. Stallone even butted heads with Rutger Hauer, who he saw as getting too much screen time. The lesson, of course, is to allow directors rather than stars to have control.

Beautiful Irene.

Lyndsay Wagner, ♥.

Although not among Stallone's best-known films, it may be one of his better films. Perhaps the studio's production problems have lead to it not getting the level of promotion it has deserved? This is now seen as the film that launched Hauer's career, and surely he is as good or better than Stallone. Hauer is now  best known for "Blade Runner", but maybe if more people saw "Nighthawks" they would have a broader appreciation for his work.

Shout! Factory has picked out the film as part of its Shout Selects line to put a spotlight on the film. It has never looked better, and has the original music put back in place (Keith Emerson, Rolling Stones). We also have new interviews that add to the discussion, as previously we had only Stallone on record talking about the stunts (which are respectable).

Now or never!

Not today coppers!

Although the Shout disc is easily the best released to date, and probably the best there ever will be, it does have shortcomings. For one, there is no audio commentary, which would have been a nice touch. But more importantly, it does not include the cut scenes, which have additional violence and plot. Much of the relationship between DaSilva and his wife is left vague, with entire scenes removed. An extended edition would be great, but even just having them separate on the disc would make this more complete.

That caveat aside, this film is amazing despite any on-set troubles and if you haven't seen it before or want to revisit it, the Shout disc is the way to go. The disc is packed -- packed! -- with interviews, including a new interview with producer (and Stallone manager) Herb Nanas, who had his first on-screen credit with this film but had actually been with Stallone for years. Cinematographer James Contner has almost 25 minutes in his interview, and is not shy about discussing on-set conflict. Lindsay Wagner talks of all her scenes that were cut (a deja vu of "The paper Chase"), and we even get a few minutes with Catherine Mary Stewart on her brief but important role. "Nighthawks" is a lost classic well worth some re-evaluation in the Stallone or Hauer canon. (Not to mention Billie Dee Williams!) 

Mean motherfucker.

Bad sister.

Another cool aspect of this film, is the fact that we get to see a lot of urban landscapes from New York. From the subway chase, to the skyscrapers, and high-altitude postcard quality shots the big apple plays indeed its own character in the movie. In addition, Lyndsay Wagner's supporting role as DaSilva's ex-wife brings a nice touch to the climax of the film. However, I really wish her scenes weren't cut as heavily as they were. She's a great actress and the sub plot of her relationship with DaSilva feels incomplete in the final edition of the film.  How ironic it is that the sole reason I wanted to watch this film is because of her presence in it, and how brief her scenes are! 

Overall, Nighthawks is one of the best action packed films from the 80's. It's sole mission to entertain from start to finish, is greatly accomplished, and the terrorist topic could have been easily taken from a 21st century film. Rutger Hauer steals the show as the cold blooded terrorist, while the good guy duo of Stallone and Dee Williams balance the quality in acting as well. Go watch it now!

Here's the movie trailer:

Viciosas al Desnudo

Evil horny hippies!

Following our latest crusade, we continue with a selection of some Spanish "cine de destape" films that are somehow available these days. Whether you understand Spanish or not is completely out of the question since all these films are pretty much extended softcore sex scenes with a few dialog interventions here and there. 

Viciosas y Desnudas (Vicious and Nude (we'll take about the wrong translation below)) is a 1980 Spanish sexploitation film written and directed by Manuel Esteba and starred by starlets Eva Lyberten & Adriana Vega. Unlike our previous entry (La Caliente Niña Julietta) this film does feature an actual plot and it's a remake of the 1977 thriller "Death Game" that featured Seymour Cassel, Sondra Locke and Colleen Camp in lead roles. In 2015, horror director Eli Roth wrote and directed "Knock Knock", the official remake of "Death Game", starring Keanu Reeves, Roth's wife Lorenza Izzo and Ana de Armas. The remake was produced by the female stars of "Death Game", Colleen Camp and Sondra Locke.

Don't invite strangers to your house.

Horny man backfired!

In a nutshell, two unnamed hippie girls (as stated by IMBD in the film's cast list) run out of luck once their car breaks down. Luckily, there's a house nearby to ask for a little room to stay  until the rain is over. The house owner, is Juan Aznar (played by Jack Taylor) a famous and successful writer who's home alone after his wife and kids went on a trip. Opening the door to the unknown horny hippies will leave him with a bittersweet taste he will never forget.

Now, going back to the Vicious and Nude English title of the film, let me tell you how wrong it is. In Spanish "vicioso/a" means depraved or addicted and this is because Vicious & vicioso are false cognates commonly mistaken as sharing the same meaning. In English, to be vicious means to be ferocious, dangerous and even malicious or cruel, so the correct English title for the film should have been "Depraved & Nude". Phew! now that my linguistical doubt is relieved, we can continue with the movie review.

Can I suck your dick?

Let's do some cum swapping.

So, after our helpful man opens the door and allows the two poor girls to take a hot shower, the main drive of the film is revealed, the two mysterious girls are actually twisted manipulative tramps who use sex to play with men until they get full control over them in order to have them doing as they please.

Obviously, there's more than meets the eye and our anti hero girls behave like that because of reasons.  The film does offer a few flashback scenes that weakly explain the origin story of the girls and as for our successful writer man of the family, he isn't necessarily an innocent bystander. Unfortunately, the limited budget or maybe the inexperienced producers involved in the making of this film, simply cannot tell the story right. 

Hey! My pussy needs some loving too!

Let me rub that clit for ya.

If Hispanic sexploitation films are somehow a genre on their own, I'd say the Mexican sexploitation films, AKA "sexy comedia" are clearly recognizable for their comedy centered mood, while the Spanish "cine de destape" tries to be as sexually driven as it can bordering becoming a porno, and also featuring, or trying to feature to be honest, serious stories about cheating, murder, etc.  

Viciosas al Desnudo is obviously out of print since the days of VHS tapes. International releases were only made in Spanish speaking countries and there is no dubbed version of the film in any language. Plans of digitized future releases on both DVD & Blu Ray are non existent to this date, and I humbly think, there will never be an official release of this movie because it isn't a memorable film. This is one of the many Spanish softcore films made to cash in from a brief period of time where these films were popular enough to attract more viewers than the usual masturbators. 

Original film trading cards from 1980.

I've swallowed so much this weekend, I'm proud of myself.

Overall, another forgettable film you could play in the background in a party with friends. The fact that you don't need Spanish to understand what's going on, sums up the quality of the film. The grand finale scene is reminiscent of other rape & revenge films but again, it's not that good. If you're a completist looking for foreign exploitation films, you may want to give this film a try, although the whole Spanish "cine de destape" genre isn't nowhere near as good as films made in Sweden, Germany & Italy.

Here's a fan made 7 minute long trailer:

La Caliente Niña Julietta

a Spanish masterpiece.

Erotic/softcore/sexploitation films neither make no statements towards any particular philosophy or politicial view, nor they reflect a moment in time where countries are changed due to a revolution or constitutional change. However, there are always exceptions to the rule. Such is the case of La Caliente Niña Julietta (The Hot Girl Julietta, actually it should have been translated as The Horny Girl Julietta) a 1981 Spanish erotic film, now thought to be the best "cine de destape" (the name of the sexploitation genre in Spain) film of all time. Directed by the once moralist film maker Ignacio Iquino, and starred by Spanish Erotica starlets Andrea Albani, Eva Lyberten & Vicky Palma, La Caliente Niña Julietta is the result of years fighting against censorship and the tyranny of the dictatorship led by son of a bitch Francisco Franco. 

 

Before Franco died, the Spanish movie industry was heavily censored and controlled by a commission of people following  Franco's wishes. As a matter of fact, it wasn't until 1975, when the dictator's bans where abolished, leading the industry into a late & rushed sexploitation scene that run until mid 80's where Spanish porn took the lead and made film makers move on to something else. Although La Caliente Niña Julieta is one of many sexploitation films made in Spain, this one stands tall compared to others due to certain political statements that are well hidden in the film, but are quite obvious for Spanish viewers. 

 

Good friends.

With a little help from my friends.

Plot wise, we're introduced to Julietta (Andrea Albani) who returns to Spain to visit her former lesbian lover Silvia (Eva Lyberten) who's stuck in a boring marriage. Obviously, they get back together quickly and decide to exchange husbands, boyfriends, lovers and finally team up to convince Rita (Vicky Palma) into a menage a atrois. The film was the most successful production of IFI studios and made $98.449.949 pesetas (around US$702.225) which means 578.320 people went to the movie theaters. Besides the gorgeous actresses, the film also offers us some of the most beautiful views you can find in Spain. Filmed in Gerona, Lloret de Mar & Tossa del Marsta the overall summertime feel of the movie adds up to the necessity of the actresses for being nude as much as they can during the hour and a half the flick runs.

The film surely knows not to take itself too seriously as the parade of characters pretty much offers us a set of stereotyped horny men, dumb horny women & a gay character that could actually survive the constant changes society has had since the 80's. Dialogs are clearly not written by Quentin Tarantino, and most of the sex scenes, are actually lesbian sex scenes that seem rather rushed than well taken care of. 

The 80's in a picture.

Love is in the air.

Now, trying to understand why this film in particular is considered a masterpiece in Spanish erotica is beyond our understanding. Nevertheless, we will compare this "masterpiece" to other films that are Spanish fan favorites: Los Violadores del Amanecer, Viciosas al Desnudo & Las Pupilas de Madame Olga, all filmed around the same time La Caliente Niña Julietta was produced save for Los Violadores del Amanecer which was filmed in 1978 and seems to be a rape/revenge type of film.

Going back to our current film in review, there is a very weird scene where our ladies are skinny dipping and all of a sudden we're offered a poem written by the Greek poet Safo de Lesbos in Aphrodite's name. The relationship between the scene and the poem remains a mystery to this very day. Another "key scene" that helps understand the elaborated plot is the fact that one of the girls wants an expensive fur coat that the other girl wants to but can't afford to. This leads to our stallions buying & stealing from one another so that they can get a good fuck in exchange, something quite pointless, cause the girls are always horny and willing to fuck at all times. No need for rewards or favors. 

Eva Lyberten was a well known erotic starlet in Spain.

She posed for many gentleman's magazines.

Like many films of its time, La Caliente Niña Julietta was released only on VHS Tape format, and has been out of print since the early 80's. The film was a fan favorite among video rental stores in Spain & Latin America. As far as we know, the film was neither dubbed nor subtitled into other languages, and honestly, there's no need for that, since this film is pretty much a visual collection of softcore sex scenes with irrelevant dialog. However, if you're interested in watching it, the film is public domain so you can watch it through several streaming services. 

Exploitation wise, the film is the standard in softcore but offers a scene that depending on how you see life, could be memorable. The lesbian lovers have a passion for liquor chocolate. What we don't know is what they do with them! Before 69 they stick the chocolate inside their wet pussies so that the other can eat it while seeing the world upside down. 

Hidden Chocolate.

No dicks allowed.

Overall, La Caliente Niña Julietta is a pretty straight forward sexploitation film. Dialog and plot are clearly not what the audience would expect in these kind of films, so if you're curious about exploitation films from unusual countries (y'know, not from Sweden, Italy, Germany or the US) And if you're planning to learn some Spanish, this may be the film that won't teach you anything at all! 

Here's a video with the opening titles and the cheesy pornish music score: