Jul 27, 2026

Supergirl (2026)

Superbore!

Alright, so the Supergirl film leaked weeks before that September 8 official release date on digital. While I was willing to wait for that legal premiere date, I was also curious about all the negative reviews the film, and how it's labeled the worst DC Comics film since 2004's Catwoman. Hitting new lows seem to be the only record Warner Bros. will keep on breaking with every film they make. 

The All-new Supergirl 

Loosely, and I have to add the adverb very before the adjective, based upon the only succesful Supergirl comic book we have seen in recent years, Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow. Now, loosely is quite a subjective word when it comes to making film adaptations. Take this year's Wuthering Heights, and you'll see it now means: having no clue about the source material, and doing whatever writers, producers and directors want with it. At this point, I'm disgusted to see a rich country like the USA waste millions of dollars in films that will go nowhere. They could definitely use that money for research, medicine, education and helping the third world survive the constant poverty state in which they are because of richer countries considered first-worlders. 

Only a few minutes does she wear her suit.

 
Krypto also appears a few minutes only.

In a  nutshell, Kara is presented as a careless alcoholic bad girl that travels from planet to planet just for the kicks. On the contrary, the source they claim having used for making this film, Kara is a compassionate being mentoring a little girl on dealing with her parents loss. Here she is just this forced Guardians of the Galaxy generic type of hero that makes you feel absolutely no connection to it, and that is a major problem considering she is the main character. The other characters, are just there to be punched by Supergirl, and occassionally Lobo, and the bad guy, who with any production where James Gunn has put his hands on, nobody will remember after a week.  Plotwise, is Kara looking for a cure for Krypto, and also trying to help Ruthye deal with her parents death. Oh, by the way, Lobo is there just to provide more ass-kicking while have actually nothing to do with the source material. Superman is also here, and perhaps the only scenes I actually cared about, were those he was in, which are essentially two. 

The excessive amount of green screen used, and CGI generated characters and battles, make it seem like another videogame that will soon be for sale on Steam. It's corporate greed that ultimately killed these films. Marvel studios is also suffering the same fate, releasing turd after turd. Disney also made people get sick and tired of Star Wars, an achievement I believed to be impossible. The only way you can support all these terrible movies, is if you are a complete and absolute moron, and seeing the world leaders we have elected, is quite clear there's a large audience for that. Gone are the days of artistic film-making.

Another element I couldn't pass on, was the fact Kara is too much of an earthling despite spending and unclear time on Earth with his cousin. Her use of American slang, a Blondie t-shirt, Earth music, and a wardrobe that is clearly from our planet, contradict the fact this is an origin story where she is still that sore Kryptonian looking for her place in the universe. As soon as you see her, you know she has already done that, so why go through planets when it's clear she has already adapted to our human customs and culture, because she probably feels she fits in our planet, thanks to his cousins aid?

 

Me good, you bad!

 
She probably didn't read the comic book either.

This remake has no moral value. Since they decided to change the ending from the source material, there is no breaking the cycle of violence, so what can a little girl learn about that? Heroes can kill so that you don't have to? A shit ton of people freaked out with Man of Steel's ending in 2013, and here we are again.

There is a reason why I stopped posting about superhero films, and it's because these films do not respect comic book readers. I'm not saying we, the readers, own these characters, or have entitlement over the subject, but it's time we see things for what they really are: The industry is milking nerds' money, that's the only reason why they're doing this, and there's a whole sub category of "casual nerds"born out of these flicks, you know, those who never read a single comic book ,or that perhaps read the most popular story arcs, or maybe only have watched these films and call themselves comic book fans. These occasional fans are not investing their money on comic books, so they're not helping the actual industry, where these wonderful stories come from, make any money.

As a final note, please do read Tom Green & Bilquis Evely's Woman of Tomorrow, that's where the better story is, and just like every comic book in history, the source material will always be superior, and the money will go the actual artists involved in the comic book, instead of film moguls, and annoying characters like Kevin Smith or James Gunn.

 


 

4 comments:

Flashback-man said...

Hola nuevamente

Me entretuvo la película, hasta ahí llego.

Un erudito de cine, no un crítico dijo hace algunos días con respecto a la Odisea, que había 3 formas de ver el cine con respecto a su director o creador. La primera ver películas, solo películas, que lo hace al director contar historias y apartarse para tu disfrute, te guste o no el dichoso film. Dejan una firma para diferenciarse del resto y nada más. Lo segundo son los grandes eventos, películas que esperas independiente del director, aunque el director tenga pergaminos. Eso es independiente si te gusto la película o no, no te cuestionas mucho, la vez y sería. La última es las películas de autor, la vez solo porque es de X director, ahí no corre si no te gusta el género, la vez porque es de él (confía en mi) aquí puede ocurrir el fenómeno de no quedar fuera de la conversación del lunes en la oficina o en los estudios. Entonces esta SG es una película de autor, está en el aire que sepas que esta James Gunn en todas partes y eso me saturo (no da para la conversa del lunes).

Como la Odisea no tenía muchas ganas de ir a ver en el cine, pero otras vicisitudes fueron más fuertes que las ganas y no fui de todos modos.

Me importa una Ha si es fiel al material original o no, lo que me desagrado y como bien argumentas todo el discurso de Argos de él bien, se buena, etc. Lo tira al WC en los últimos minutos de película, hasta Batman no haría eso, entonces y resumiendo sin spoilers:
El leitmotiv bien claro.
El villano muy genérico y sacado de GDLG, pero onda con descuento.
Lobo un meme, está ahí para que digas! OH esta Lobo ¡y seria.
La coprotagonista un accesorio, que este o no, no modifica la trama, es para dar un arco de relleno (las novias), aunque es importante en el comic.
Kara no me desagrado la protagonista, pero mal contada su historia, la personalidad como cualquier personaje de J.J.Habrams es deconstruirlo dejándolo en un " y si le damos un beso para que se olvide de que fue mala, fin"

En fin, no fue insufrible, pero no suma al universo de JG, eso.
Nos vemos, quizás la reseñe, quizás no.

SPAM Alternative said...

Yo creo que la taquilla de esta película, y el hecho que se haya adelantado su llegada a plataformas de arriendo como Apple TV y Prime ya te indica que le fue mal. Me gustó eso que dices de las 3 formas en las que uno ve una película. Creo que Supergirl es un personaje que siempre fue derivado de Superman y acá, eso no cambia. Tuvieron la oportunidad de usar más del cómic del cual dicen haber basado el guión y optaron por repetir canciones antiguas, secuencias en CGI y muchos personajes que no logran desarrollarse y solamente están ahí porque sí.

Flashback-man said...

Hola concuerdo, en la junta ampliaremos más la conversación.

SPAM Alternative said...

Sin dudas, importará una galaxia de hongos quienes no la hayan visto a estas alturas